Normalization of Deviance in Manufacturing

 "We’ve been doing it this way for a long time, and no one said anything."


That is one of the most dangerous sentences in a GMP and Health & Safety environment.

Normalization of deviance does not announce itself. It builds through small, unchallenged exceptions until they become the culture.

You hear it in comments like:

“QA hasn’t flagged it.”
“I don’t want to open a can of worms.”
“It’s not impacting output.”
“Regulatory authority did not catch it last time.”
“We’ll fix it during shutdown.”

These are not casual comments. They are early warning signs of a culture drifting away from standards.

What strong cultures do differently:
• They follow procedures. If something does not work, fix it through change control. No workarounds.
• Avoid assumptions. They verify, document, and act on facts (data-driven decision making)
• Prevent recurrence. Use effective CAPA to address root causes, not symptoms (Poka-Yoke, mistake proofing).
• Build psychological safety so anyone can speak up without fear of consequences.
• Improve daily, not just before audits (Kaizen + Gemba walks).
• Automate where it reduces human error, improves consistency, and strengthens compliance (Jidoka + Poka-Yoke).

Right First Time is not a slogan. It comes from the decisions made when no one is watching. Fix the gap before it escalates into something bigger. Or worse.




#QualityLeadership #GMP #Safety #RFT #ContinuousImprovement #QA #ManufacturingOperations #Deviation

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"The solution is yours. Go fix it."

Image
My first experience in pharmaceutical manufacturing shaped my mindset. I started as a temporary worker in a pharmaceutical manufacturing stockroom. It was my first opportunity in the industry, and it became a defining moment in my career. Finding materials was a daily challenge. We had SAP/ERP systems, but inventory locations were poorly organized at the time. Materials were stacked wherever space was available, and valuable production time was lost searching for what teams needed. I brought the issue to my supervisor, expecting direction. His response was simple: "The solution is yours. Go fix it." At first, I was surprised. I wasn't a manager, and I wasn't even a full-time employee. But that moment changed my perspective on leadership. I learned that leadership is not defined by a title. It is demonstrated through ownership, initiative, and the ability to create value. That mindset shaped how I approached every role that followed, from leading teams to driving conti...
Read more

The Psychology in GMP Manufacturing Training: Choice Overload and the Primacy Effect

Image
  What Psychology Can Teach Us About GMP Manufacturing Training: Choice Overload and the Primacy Effect In GMP manufacturing, we often talk about training gaps in terms of incomplete training, overdue training, or employees who have not completed the required curriculum. But what if the training gap is not simply about whether someone completed a training module? What if the way we design procedures, deliver training, and introduce employees to the manufacturing environment is also influencing how people make decisions and perform? I recently read about two psychological concepts that made me think differently about manufacturing performance: Choice Overload and the Primacy Effect . While these concepts come from psychology and behavioral research, I believe they offer valuable lessons for GMP manufacturing, particularly when we think about operator training, SOPs, competency, human error, and quality culture. Choice Overload: When More Choices Make Decisions Harder Choice Overloa...
Read more

Data Integrity in GMP Manufacturing

  Early in my career, I thought Data Integrity was mainly about falsification, missing signatures, and backdating. Over time, I realized the biggest risks often come from daily habits that professionals sometimes overlook. Data integrity extends beyond the GMP floor. Every person who creates, reviews, approves, or accesses data influences the trustworthiness of that data. 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐯𝐬. 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: Assumption:  𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘘𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵'𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺. Reality: Quality provides oversight, but everyone owns the behaviors that protect data reliability. Assumption: 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘬 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳 𝘈𝘓𝘊𝘖𝘈+  Reality: Most issues start with small decisions that seem harmless in the moment. 𝐄𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬: - 𝘓𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘺. - 𝘙𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦...
Read more